Looking for the best startup accelerators? Cool, we got you! And the rankings are sure to surprise you.
Did you know there are over 3,000 accelerators worldwide and over 1,000 in the United States alone? No wonder it’s confusing to figure out which ones are worth applying to.
Unlike other lists that are totally subjective or focused on size alone, this list focuses on the thing that probably matter most to founders: the accelerators’ ability to set your startup on the path to success.
To judge the accelerators’ ability to “accelerate,” we took a look at how many of their portfolio startups actually had an exit such as an acquisition or IPO. We measure this as a simple ratio of total number of investments to exits, which we call “exit rate.”
Those accelerators with the highest proportion of startups that had an exit, or exit rate, are ranked at the top.
Best Startup Accelerators with 100+ Investments
If you’re looking for popular accelerators like Y Combinator and 500 Startups to top the list, we’re sorry to disappoint you. According to exit rate, YC and 500 Startups are ranked 18th and 16th respectively. Techstars overall is ranked 21st although individual Techstars programs like Techstars Seattle are ranked at the top.
The best accelerators on this list see more than one in five (more than 20%) of their investments reach an exit, which is astounding.
Another interesting point to note is that all of the top 15 accelerators have fewer than 300 investments, whereas those with more than 1,000 investments tend to cluster at the bottom of the list. The four most active accelerators have an exit rate of about 10% or half that of the top ones like AngelPad, Founder Friendly Labs, and Starve Ups.
Accelerators at the bottom of the list have exit rates of about 2% or one-tenth that of the best-performing ones.
Below is the full ranking:
|Rank||Accelerator||Number of Investments||Number of Exits||Exit Rate|
|1||Techstars Boulder Accelerator||162||40||24.7%|
|2||Techstars Seattle Accelerator||125||27||21.6%|
|3||Founder Friendly Labs||121||25||20.7%|
|7||Techstars Boston Accelerator||195||33||16.9%|
|9||Techstars New York City Accelerator||217||33||15.2%|
|10||StartX (Stanford-StartX Fund)||291||41||14.1%|
|12||Google Launchpad Accelerator||117||13||11.1%|
|20||plug and play||1,076||89||8.3%|
|23||Entrepreneurs Roundtable Accelerator||242||19||7.9%|
|32||MIT delta v||130||6||4.6%|
|34||Quake Capital Partners||156||4||2.6%|
Beyond individual Techstars programs like Techstars Boulder, top startup accelerators include Founder Friendly Labs (20.7%), AngelPad (20.3%), Starve Ups(17.5%), Microsoft Accelerator(16.0%), and Stanford’s StartX(14.1%).
If you care about getting to an exit, perhaps it’s worth looking beyond the usual suspects such as YC, 500 Startups, MassChallenge, and Techstars unless you’re looking at those Techstars programs at the top of this list.
Now, let’s take a look at which accelerators invest most frequently in diverse founders.
Best Startup Accelerators for Diverse Founders
Given that tech startups are increasingly being founded by women and the New Majority, it’s interesting to take a look at which accelerators are most likely to invest in women and underrepresented founders.
We rank those accelerators with the highest proportion of diversity investments at the top using this measure as a proxy for their propensity to invest in women and multicultural founders.
I do want to point out, however, that Crunchbase only recently started tracking diversity investment metrics, so this data set might be a bit off. In case you curious to know what Crunchbase defines as “diversity investments,” it is my understanding that this number includes any investment in a startup that has been founded or is led by a founder that identifies with any of the following groups: Black or African American, Native America, Middle Eastern/North African, South Asia, East Asian, Southeast Asian, Pacific Islander, or Woman.
Here are the rankings for the best accelerators for diverse founders:
|Rank||Accelerator||Number of Investments||Number of Diversity Investments||Diversity Investment Rate|
|1||Quake Capital Partners||156||69||44.2%|
|3||Techstars New York City Accelerator||217||80||36.9%|
|4||MIT delta v||130||46||35.4%|
|6||Entrepreneurs Roundtable Accelerator||242||70||28.9%|
|7||StartX (Stanford-StartX Fund)||291||83||28.5%|
|15||Techstars Boston Accelerator||195||49||25.1%|
|18||Techstars Boulder Accelerator||162||35||21.6%|
|22||Founder Friendly Labs||121||25||20.7%|
|26||Techstars Seattle Accelerator||125||23||18.4%|
|34||ASU Venture Devils||131||17||13.0%|
|35||plug and play||1,076||136||12.6%|
|39||Google Launchpad Accelerator||117||6||5.1%|
Dead last on this list is Google Launchpad Accelerator with the Microsoft Accelerator not doing much better. Once again, the data might not be the most reliable, particularly for diversity investments, which Crunchbase only recently started tracking. (As a Xoogler, I hope that’s the case!)
Once again, the most popular accelerators like Y Combinator, 500 Startups, MassChallenge, and SOSV rank toward the bottom of this list as well. Only specifc Techstars programs such as Techstars Chicago rise to the top in terms of their rate of investment in women and founders of color.
Smaller accelerator programs such as Quake Capital and FOOD-X along with university-affiliated accelerators have the highest proportion of diversity investments.
What does this mean for female or underrepresented founders? Perhaps the best accelerators are smaller programs that both have a high exit rate as well as diversity investment rate.
I recognize that this analysis, although based on data, is imperfect. It would have been nice to also look at satisfaction rate, mark-ups in valuation, and other factors not captured here. At the same time, it’s interesting to see that smaller accelerator programs tend to perform better on both exit rate and diversity investment rate perhaps casting into scrutiny the value of bigger, more established programs.
Hopefully, this article helps you, the founder, identify those accelerator programs that are likely to be the best fit for your startup.
Some Important Notes and Caveats About this List
First, we pulled data on accelerators from CrunchBase. I’m sure there are some gaps in the data, but it’s probably more than good enough to get a reliable ranking. However, there probably isn’t much of a difference between, say, number fifteen and sixteen on the list.
Second, I only included U.S.-based accelerators with more than a hundred investments. That’s pretty arbitrary, I know, but we wanted those with enough data points, so we can be more confident with the ranking. Having said that, there are probably great small accelerators not on this list.
You Might Also Like
About Beta Boom
Beta Boom is a pre-seed fund investing in software startups building the future for women and multicultural consumers. Plus, we help our startups succeed with daily support from our growth team and trained startup coaches.